What Ever Happened to Scientific Objectivity?
Founders and advocates for evolution
have worked long and hard over the past century
to discredit the truth of God's six-day Creation.
It was the only way for them to get their modern
ideas to gain acceptance—not just
scientific, but also social, political and
religious ideas. Evolution became their tool to
rebel against the authority of the Living God who
created all things as we know them. Through
evolution they sought to systematically take God—whom
they despised—out of the picture, and grant
themselves power and authority over the lives of
people subject to their control and influence.
Historically, it has been shown that
Christian thought and reasoning over the past
millennium have been largely responsible for the
very foundations of modern science. Many famous
scientists, researchers and inventors throughout
history[1] were
believers in the one true, living God who created
the heavens and the earth by His command. They
were creationists. Their thoughts, logic and
reason worked lucidly and in harmony with their
beliefs. Even today no one argues with the legacy
these men and women have passed on to us.
 Today there
are many scientists[2],[3], doctors,
biologists and researchers who wholeheartedly
embrace God as the Author Creator and go about
their life's work with just as much passion and
drive as those who purport evolution. Creation
does not limit their ingenuity or creative powers.
It does not put them in a box outside of which
they are not allowed to think. These men and
women use their rational and intellectual
capacities to the fullest degree, producing
credible, verifiable research and findings that
challenge the very notion of evolution.
Unfortunately, with evolution, the
baby does get thrown out with the bathwater.
Along with God goes lots of clear reasoning. The
efforts of many scientists are tainted by rabid
desperation to prove something that must be taken
by faith just as much as belief in creation.
By taking nearly complete control of
government-directed education policy and the
media, evolution advocates strive to give people
no other alternative than to think that all life
on earth necessarily evolved from microorganisms.
With the media generally on their side, they have
nearly succeeded in doing so. Instead of offering
any sound, logical basis for their system of
thought, they use circular reasoning that is
sufficiently convoluted and complex, that people
who never heard otherwise might never think
otherwise and question some of the many
outrageous claims they have made beyond reason
and evidence.
 Instead of
solid reasoning, there is much rhethoric. Instead
of hard evidence, there is massive hype and media
exposure that surrounds any new find falling into
their laps (only to be forgotten when the
evidence inevitably turns against them and is
replaced by new evidence). Instead of tangible
proofs, there are numerous hoaxes. Instead of
science, they have become experts in
archaeological digging, skeleton reconstruction,
3D computer modeling and story crafting—these
are tools of science, but not its essence.
Millions and countless hours have
been spent to prove it. People have staked their
reputations and lives on it, holding it to be
unswervingly true, one day to be fully
substantiated. Yet to this day, not one single
verifiiable transitional form or sequence has
ever been produced. Nor has any mechanism which
could result in stable, beneficial
macroevolutionary changes ever been demonstrated.
It is all speculation, full of deceptions and
coverups. And they want us to believe in
evolution as "fact".
What we have to wonder is why we
ever allowed them to replace the truth of
Creation with a fabricated lie in the first place.
|
